TFGBV Taxonomy
Perpetrator Intent:

Entertainment

Last Updated 5/30/25
Definition: The use of TFGBV tactics for amusement, enjoyment, or personal satisfaction derived from causing distress to targets.
Abuse Types:
Intimate image abuse (IIA) Online harassment Inappropriate content Deceptive synthetic media Voyeuristic recording
Perpetrators:
Informal group Stranger
Targets:
Private individual Public figure Organization, group, community Society
Impact Types:
Abuse normalization Psychological & emotional harm Infringement of rights & freedoms Sexual harm

Examples

  • Trolling campaigns targeting individuals for perpetrator amusement
  • Creating and sharing deceptive content (including fake profiles) to mock or humiliate targets
  • Coordinated harassment where participants join in "for fun" rather than deeper motivations

Description

Entertainment-driven abuse is characterized by perpetrators seeking amusement through causing harm, often without concern for actual impact on targets.

Perpetrators, especially adolescent perpetrators, may cyberbully "just for fun," noting this motivation differs from gaining pleasure by hurting others because perpetrators focused on entertainment "may not be concerned about whether or not their targets are hurt" (Varjas, 2010). Often seen in the context of schools, targeting teachers and classmates, studies document "boredom" as a key driver where perpetrators victimize others "in an effort to fill time or create entertainment" (Varjas et al., 2010). Researchers have found strong correlations between sadism and trolling behavior, concluding that "online trolls are prototypical everyday sadists" who experience "sadistic glee at the distress of others" (Buckels, 2014).

"Gendertrolling" has been identified as a distinct subset of trolling behavior where "mostly male trolls harass mostly women" for entertainment purposes (Meyer et al., 2019). Female influencers have been shown to experience greater frequency of online harassment, with more violent material, than their male counterparts (Views4You, 2024).

References

  • Evelyn, S., Clancy, E. M., Klettke, B., & Tatnell, R. (2022). A Phenomenological Investigation into Cyberbullying as Experienced by People Identifying as Transgender or Gender Diverse. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116560
  • Abreu, R. L., & Kenny, M. C. (2017). Cyberbullying and LGBTQ Youth: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for Prevention and Intervention. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 11(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-017-0175-7
  • Paananen, A., & Reichl, A. J. (2019). Gendertrolls just want to have fun, too. Personality and Individual Differences, 141(94), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.011
  • Todd, P. R., & Melancon, J. (2019). Gender Differences in Perceptions of Trolling in Livestream Video Broadcasting. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(7), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0560
  • UN Women. (2023, November 13). Creating safe digital spaces free of trolls, doxing, and hate speech. UN Women – Headquarters. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/explainer/2023/11/creating-safe-digital-spaces-free-of-trolls-doxing-and-hate-speech
  • Sirena, B. (2025, May 12). 75% of Users Face Cyberbullying on Social Media. Views4You. https://views4you.com/blog/cyberbullying-on-social-media/
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2023). 1991-2023 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data. http://yrbs-explorer.services.cdc.gov/
Is something missing, or could it be better?
About This SiteGet InvolvedContactCopyrightPrivacy
Loading...