TFGBV Taxonomy
Target:

Organization, group, community

Last Updated 6/2/25
Definition: Collective entities including advocacy groups, community organizations, and informal communities that are targeted for TFGBV to undermine their mission or silence their members.
Abuse Types:
Online harassment Doxxing Inappropriate content Online impersonation
Impact Types:
Self-censorship Social & political harm Economic harm Abuse normalization Infringement of rights & freedoms Psychological & emotional harm
Mitigation Strategies:
Prioritized reporting Safety onboarding & awareness training Update ranking model User-controlled content filters Quarantine borderline content Transparent feedback and reporting
Perpetrator Intents:
Aggrandizement Compliance Entertainment Financial gain Punitive intent Silence Sexual gratification
Perpetrators:
Formal group Informal group Nation-state

Synonyms

Collective target, Community entity, Organizational target

Examples

  • Domestic violence support organizations facing coordinated harassment campaigns
  • LGBTQ+ community groups targeted with hate speech and doxxing
  • Religious institutions serving marginalized populations experiencing online attacks

Description

Organizations, groups, and communities face distinct TFGBV patterns designed to undermine their collective voice and social impact.

These targets are often selected because they represent or advocate for marginalized populations, challenge existing power structures, or provide critical social safety nets. The eSafety Commissioner research indicates that marginalized communities face disproportionate risks, with targeting often designed to fragment community cohesion and silence collective advocacy efforts. This includes formal organizations like NGOs working on gender equality, informal community groups like local Facebook support networks, and religious or cultural institutions serving vulnerable populations.

The targeting frequently extends beyond the organization itself to individual members, volunteers, and beneficiaries, creating a chilling effect that can undermine the organization's ability to serve its community.

Intersectional targeting is common, where organizations serving multiple marginalized identities face compounded harassment across different vectors of identity and mission.

References

  • Australian eSafety Commissioner, & Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2024, October). Annual report 2023-24. Australian ESafety Commissioner. https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA-eSafety-annual-report-2023-24.pdf
Is something missing, or could it be better?
About This SiteGet InvolvedContactCopyrightPrivacy
Loading...